[srslte-users] Fwd: Help with your code
John Sfox
sfoxsfoxjohn at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 15:04:45 UTC 2016
Ok!
But using
./pdsch_ue -f valueFreqeuncy
this is the result
......
Found Cell_id: 0 CP: Normal , DetectRatio= 0% PSR=0.00, Power=-inf dBm
*Found Cell_id: 424 CP: Normal , DetectRatio=100% PSR=13.16, Power=44.8 dBm
Found Cell_id: 425 CP: Normal , DetectRatio=91% PSR=10.35, Power=44.0 dBm
Decoding PBCH for cell 424 (N_id_2=1)
....
Setting sampling rate 15.36 MHz
- Cell ID: 424 1.3, FrameCnt: 0, State: 1
- Nof ports: 2
- CP: Normal
- PRB: 50
- PHICH Length: Normal
- PHICH Resources: 1
- SFN: 780
Decoded MIB. SFN: 780, offset: 1
CFO: +2.65 KHz, SNR: -nan dB, PDCCH-Miss: -nan%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +2.45 KHz, SNR: -nan dB, PDCCH-Miss: -nan%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +2.29 KHz, SNR: -nan dB, PDCCH-Miss: -nan%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +2.16 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +2.05 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.96 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.89 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.83 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.79 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.74 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.72 KHz, SNR: 15.5 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.70 KHz, SNR: 15.7 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.68 KHz, SNR: 15.7 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.66 KHz, SNR: 15.7 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.65 KHz, SNR: 15.7 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.63 KHz, SNR: 15.7 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.62 KHz, SNR: 15.7 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
CFO: +1.63 KHz, SNR: 15.7 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
^CSIGINT received. Exiting...
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Ismael Gomez <
ismael.gomez at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
> No, to run pdsch_ue against a public LTE cell you only need to run:
>
> ./pdsch_ue -f valueFreqeuncy
>
> and optionally -g gainValue
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 at 15:55 John Sfox <sfoxsfoxjohn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ./pdsch_ue -f valueFreqeuncy or
>> ./pdsch_ue -f valueFreqeuncy -p NumberOfRB -P numberOfPort -c cellId -g
>> gainValue
>>
>> I used several combinations from the minimum (only frequency value) or
>> plus gain Value, number of resource blocks, cell Id, numer of ports etc.
>>
>> The result is always the same that I posted before.
>>
>> Thanks
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Ismael Gomez <
>> ismael.gomez at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like it does not found SIB messages. What command are you using to
>>> run pdsch_ue?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, 10:55 John Sfox, <sfoxsfoxjohn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is the output of pdsch_ue:
>>>> .....
>>>>
>>>> .....
>>>> Searching for cell...
>>>> Using Volk machine: avx_64_mmx_orc
>>>> Found Cell_id: 0 CP: Normal , DetectRatio= 0% PSR=0.00, Power=-inf
>>>> dBm
>>>> *Found Cell_id: 424 CP: Normal , DetectRatio=51% PSR=10.01, Power=45.1
>>>> dBm
>>>> Found Cell_id: 20 CP: Normal , DetectRatio=100% PSR=10.15,
>>>> Power=33.9 dBm
>>>>
>>>> Decoding PBCH for cell 424 (N_id_2=1)
>>>> -- Asking for clock rate 15.360000 MHz...
>>>> -- Actually got clock rate 15.360000 MHz.
>>>> -- Performing timer loopback test... pass
>>>> -- Performing timer loopback test... pass
>>>> Setting sampling rate 15.36 MHz
>>>> - Cell ID: 424 2.6, FrameCnt: 0, State: 1 0
>>>> - Nof ports: 2
>>>> - CP: Normal
>>>> - PRB: 50
>>>> - PHICH Length: Normal
>>>> - PHICH Resources: 1
>>>> - SFN: 524
>>>> Decoded MIB. SFN: 524, offset: 3
>>>> CFO: +2.67 KHz, SNR: -nan dB, PDCCH-Miss: -nan%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +2.46 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +2.29 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +2.15 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +2.04 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.95 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.87 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.81 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.76 KHz, SNR: 17.0 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.72 KHz, SNR: 18.6 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.69 KHz, SNR: 18.6 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.67 KHz, SNR: 18.6 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.66 KHz, SNR: 18.6 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.64 KHz, SNR: 18.6 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> CFO: +1.62 KHz, SNR: 18.6 dB, PDCCH-Miss: 100.00%, PDSCH-BLER: -nan%
>>>> ^CSIGINT received. Exiting...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But related to reference signal (that is what I need to evaluate the
>>>> coverage) what do you suggest?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ismael Gomez <
>>>> ismael.gomez at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have you tried with pdsch_ue tool?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 at 08:47 John Sfox <sfoxsfoxjohn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ismael, using cell_search 5 times, it found the cells twice.
>>>>>> cell_measurement, found the cell and write:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .........
>>>>>> Searching for cell...
>>>>>> Using Volk machine: avx_64_mmx_orc
>>>>>> Found Cell_id: 0 CP: Normal , DetectRatio= 0% PSR=0.00,
>>>>>> Power=-inf dBm
>>>>>> *Found Cell_id: 424 CP: Normal , DetectRatio=50% PSR=10.01,
>>>>>> Power=-7.5 dBm
>>>>>> Found Cell_id: 0 CP: Normal , DetectRatio= 0% PSR=0.00,
>>>>>> Power=-inf dBm
>>>>>> Decoding PBCH for cell 424 (N_id_2=1)
>>>>>> -- Asking for clock rate 15.360000 MHz...
>>>>>> -- Actually got clock rate 15.360000 MHz.
>>>>>> -- Performing timer loopback test... pass
>>>>>> -- Performing timer loopback test... pass
>>>>>> Setting sampling rate 15.36 MHz
>>>>>> Finding PSS... Peak: 0.2, FrameCnt: 0, State: 0
>>>>>> Finding PSS... Peak: 0.4, FrameCnt: 0, State: 0
>>>>>> Finding PSS... Peak: 0.6, FrameCnt: 0, State: 0
>>>>>> Finding PSS... Peak: 0.7, FrameCnt: 0, State: 0
>>>>>> Finding PSS... Peak: 0.8, FrameCnt: 0, State: 0
>>>>>> Finding PSS... Peak: 1.5, FrameCnt: 0, State: 1
>>>>>> Decoded MIB. SFN: 888, offset: 3
>>>>>> CFO: +2.1863 KHz, SFO: -0.6667 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: -nan
>>>>>> CFO: +1.9665 KHz, SFO: -0.7895 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.8253 KHz, SFO: -0.6522 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.7310 KHz, SFO: -0.9259 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.6702 KHz, SFO: -0.8065 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.6262 KHz, SFO: -0.7143 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5998 KHz, SFO: -0.6410 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5832 KHz, SFO: -0.8140 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5703 KHz, SFO: -0.7447 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5656 KHz, SFO: -0.6863 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5625 KHz, SFO: -0.8182 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5588 KHz, SFO: -0.7627 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5591 KHz, SFO: -0.7143 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5508 KHz, SFO: -0.8209 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5560 KHz, SFO: -0.7746 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5578 KHz, SFO: -0.7333 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5503 KHz, SFO: -0.6962 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5520 KHz, SFO: -0.7831 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5522 KHz, SFO: -0.7471 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5498 KHz, SFO: -0.7143 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5476 KHz, SFO: -0.7895 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5489 KHz, SFO: -0.7576 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5486 KHz, SFO: -0.7282 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5500 KHz, SFO: -0.7009 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5521 KHz, SFO: -0.7658 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5454 KHz, SFO: -0.7391 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5472 KHz, SFO: -0.7143 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5439 KHz, SFO: -0.7724 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5432 KHz, SFO: -0.7480 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5404 KHz, SFO: -0.7252 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5524 KHz, SFO: -0.7778 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5547 KHz, SFO: -0.7554 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5559 KHz, SFO: -0.7343 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5576 KHz, SFO: -0.7143 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5612 KHz, SFO: -0.7616 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5697 KHz, SFO: -0.7419 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5709 KHz, SFO: -0.7233 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5667 KHz, SFO: -0.7669 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5635 KHz, SFO: -0.7485 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5619 KHz, SFO: -0.7310 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5630 KHz, SFO: -0.7714 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5527 KHz, SFO: -0.7542 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5505 KHz, SFO: -0.7377 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5519 KHz, SFO: -0.7219 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5521 KHz, SFO: -0.7592 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5554 KHz, SFO: -0.7436 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5537 KHz, SFO: -0.7286 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5488 KHz, SFO: -0.7635 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5565 KHz, SFO: -0.7488 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5508 KHz, SFO: -0.7346 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5539 KHz, SFO: -0.7674 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5507 KHz, SFO: -0.7534 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5459 KHz, SFO: -0.7399 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5435 KHz, SFO: -0.7269 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5455 KHz, SFO: -0.7576 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5426 KHz, SFO: -0.7447 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5542 KHz, SFO: -0.7322 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5524 KHz, SFO: -0.7613 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5589 KHz, SFO: -0.7490 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5557 KHz, SFO: -0.7371 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5506 KHz, SFO: -0.7255 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5440 KHz, SFO: -0.7529 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5470 KHz, SFO: -0.7414 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5512 KHz, SFO: -0.7303 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> CFO: +1.5564 KHz, SFO: -0.7380 Khz, NOI: 0.00, PDCCH-Det: 0.000
>>>>>> ^CSIGINT received. Exiting...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and so on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thamk you
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Ismael Gomez <
>>>>>> ismael.gomez at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you tried the cell_search program in these LTE bands?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 at 09:58 John Sfox <sfoxsfoxjohn at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Ismael, thank you for your replay.
>>>>>>>> Using a spectrum analyzer of the University, I have collected all
>>>>>>>> the cells in the area for 800MHz, 1800MHz e 2200MHz and their
>>>>>>>> bandwidths.
>>>>>>>> The cells at 800MHz had bandwidth of 10MHz.
>>>>>>>> The cells at 1800MHz had bandwidth of 15MHz (1 10MHz)
>>>>>>>> The cells at 2200MHz had Bandwidth of 15MHz (1 20MHz).
>>>>>>>> Srslte never worked at 800 MHz and at 1800MHz. At 2200MHz, it has
>>>>>>>> only worked for a cell with BW 15MHz
>>>>>>>> Thank you again
>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>>>>>>> <#-65592669212000630_m_-8536860175219300229_-1124727061549475576_m_-5433398701804568750_8512039743991471051_m_-7903770007788375743_-8302944468710889422_m_-6526612104687365019_2029646711665639488_DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Ismael Gomez <
>>>>>>>> ismael.gomez at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What frequencies are you using? Do you know what BW these networks
>>>>>>>>> operate at?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 at 15:09 John Sfox <sfoxsfoxjohn at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>> I'm a student and I would like to integrate an lte receiver in my
>>>>>>>>>> project related to verify the lte coverage for differnt height
>>>>>>>>>> values.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm using a drone developed by the university with the Ettus B210.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I used your examples (cell measurements in particular where you
>>>>>>>>>> can pick up various parameters related to lte coverage like
>>>>>>>>>> RSSI, RSRP, RSPQ, SNR) but these do not work for all frequencies present
>>>>>>>>>> in this area
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could you help me understand how to properly use your library.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> srslte-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> srslte-users at lists.softwareradiosystems.com
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.softwareradiosystems.com/mailman/listinfo/srslte-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> srslte-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> srslte-users at lists.softwareradiosystems.com
>>>>>>>> http://www.softwareradiosystems.com/mailman/listinfo/srslte-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.srsran.com/pipermail/srsran-users/attachments/20160322/f8eded48/attachment.htm>
More information about the srsran-users
mailing list