[srslte-users] "Status"
Andrea Valori
avalori at gmail.com
Thu May 6 21:19:26 UTC 2021
Francisco,
the t option is something I found and used extensively, the problem is how
to extract the information afterwards. I sent the stdout to a text file and
then created a Python script to extract the text and parse it... it works
but definitely is not clean.
Many thanks for mentioning the "expert json report" that is something I was
not aware of and I will investigate...
Andrea
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:29, Francisco Paisana <
francisco.paisana at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
> Ah, I also forgot the new way to get enb reports via
> "--expert.report_json_enable=true". That should create a new file in
> /tmp/enb_report.json with all the enb parameters in json format.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Francisco
>
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:19 PM Francisco Paisana <
> francisco.paisana at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
>
>> Ah apologies you mentioned the srsenb traces. You could also "tail" the
>> enb.log for "PHR" or any other information.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Francisco
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:17 PM Francisco Paisana <
>> francisco.paisana at softwareradiosystems.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What about pressing "t" in the srsenb command line to get the traces?
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Francisco
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 2:08 PM Andrea Valori <avalori at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to get a "status" of the system?
>>>> Questions I would like to answer are of the kind
>>>>
>>>> 1. "which users are connected?"
>>>> 2. "which one is their phr?" (to understand if they are moving away
>>>> and likely to drop)
>>>>
>>>> I seem to understand that this is not something so simple to
>>>> implement... at the moment I can get the answer to 1. by tracking attach
>>>> and detach from the stdout of srsepc, and I can get answer 2. from tracking
>>>> and parsing the trace of srsenb... not really something "straightforward",
>>>> but maybe I am missing something?
>>>> Is there a more sensible way to approach this? Or maybe something
>>>> already implemented in the stack that I am not aware of?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> srslte-users mailing list
>>>> srslte-users at lists.softwareradiosystems.com
>>>> http://www.softwareradiosystems.com/mailman/listinfo/srslte-users
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.srsran.com/pipermail/srsran-users/attachments/20210506/3544577e/attachment.htm>
More information about the srsran-users
mailing list